Who Reviews My Paper after Submission?

A paper is a collection of several primary pieces of literature to produce a coherent argument regarding a topic. To put it simply, a paper is a publication concerning a particular topic. The paper can either be published in a Journal. A paper can also be a thesis.

The purpose of a paper review is to scrutinize recent progress in a particular topic. The paper is simply a summary of what an individual knows concerning a topic based on research conducted. The paper helps readers understand the current trends regarding a topic via the facts presented in the paper.

Scientists use a review paper to communicate with the general public as well as his fellow scientists about his findings of a certain subject.

So, Who Reviews Your Paper?

Naturally, papers are reviewed by editors and his team. The major aim of such reviews is to spot errors in such papers before they are approved for publication.

The steps involved in reviewing papers include the following:

check mark Submission Of Paper

This is the first stage involved in reviewing a paper. The submitting author submits the paper he intends to be published to the journal. This submission may be through online systems and occasionally via emails.

check mark Editorial Office Assessment

The journal then goes ahead to check the composition of the paper and the arrangements of the paper. These things are compared to the journal’s authors guideline to ensure that the paper includes the needed sections and styling. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.

check mark Appraisal By The Editor-In-Chief

The Editor-In-Chief checks the paper to ensure it is original, interesting, and meets the appropriate for the journal.

check mark Assignment Of Associate Editors

The Editor-In-Charge then assigned to go through the paper at this stage. Although some journals do not have Associate Editors.

check mark Invitation To Reviewers

The handling editor, at this point, will invite individuals that would be suitable to review the work. The reviewers are normally two.

The potential reviewers will consider the invitation. If it suits their expertise and they’re available, they accept or otherwise, they decline.

check mark Review Proper

The reviewers will now go through the paper. The first reading of the paper is to form an impression of its content. At this stage, the paper can be rejected. The paper is then read for several times if it scales the first reading.

In the end, a review is submitted to the journal with a suggestion to reject or accept it, and in some cases, revision.

check mark Evaluation Of The Review

At this point, the handling editor will go through the review before making a decision. In some cases, he/she may invite other reviewers.

check mark Communication Of Decision

On reaching his/her decision, the handling editor communicates the decision reached via an email to the author. If accepted, the paper will be published. If rejected, it will be sent to the author for minor or major revision.

Conclusion

It is important to take note of these steps to come up with a paper that will satisfy both the editor (who is the chief reviewer) and the other people in his/her team.

scientific editing

Useful sources

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Excluding reviewers from your paper

Excluding Reviewers from Reviewing Your Paper – Why & How?

Many authors choose to allow their manuscripts to not be accessible by “non-preferred reviewers,” who are specific individuals that fall under the category of people that authors don’t want them to receive their manuscripts for review. Excluding reviewers is a common practice greatly attributed to the fact that most authors consider some individuals as an…
Suggesting Peer Reviewers for your Paper

Suggesting Peer Reviewers for Your Paper

For over 300 years, the peer review validation method has been used by scholars to assess the quality of their work and research. Its major purpose has been to validate academic work, increase networking possibilities, and polish the quality of published research. Although this method has received some criticism, it is still the most popularly…
Problems with open access journals

Problems with Open Access Journals

Like everything else evolving, the acceptance of open access journals among authors and readers increases tremendously by the day. As researchers, funders and publishers invest quite some in newer opportunities, open access journals sure come with lots of benefits. However, a few problems have been associated with this type of publication as well over the…
Mega journal definition

What Is a Mega Journal? Characteristics & Examples

Definition Mega journals are trendy in academic publishing. These scholarly journals are peer-reviewed open access journals, much larger than traditional journals, and subject to a less strict selection process. To understand the main idea behind Mega journals, one must first understand Open Access publishing (OA). Simply put, OA gives access to published information; this information…
Article processing charge (APC)

What Is an Article Processing Charge (APC)?

Every journal written and published on various publications in the paper-only days collected huge charges. However, even with the vast array of free blog and article posts, this policy is still applicable to certain publications today. Let’s get to it. Article Processing Charge (APC) Well Explained With lots of content, journals, reports, and electronic books…